Trying to add a payment method? You can do this on the 
Just when patient safety problems at Oregon State Hospital seemed to be fading from public view, new signs of a storm are brewing.
Friday, the Marion County District Attorney announced that a grand jury would examine the conditions and management of the state-run psychiatric hospital in Salem. This put it essentially back where it was a year ago, when Lookout Eugene-Springfield began reporting on safety concerns that preceded the death of 25-year-old Lane County resident Kenneth Hass in March 2025.
We don’t know what prompted Marion County’s new grand jury inquiry — whether it relates to known safety problems or if the district attorney is investigating new allegations. But given the hospital’s “culture of complacency” that slowed executives’ previous response to mounting challenges, we do know this investigation needs maximum transparency.
Over the last several months, it seemed conditions at the state hospital were improving. Following years of denying the scope of the problems, officials with the Oregon Health Authority, the state agency overseeing the psychiatric hospital, committed to making changes during a November hearing before a panel of lawmakers — a hearing this editorial board had previously called for. In January, federal inspectors declared the hospital in “substantial compliance” with guidelines after previously documenting repeated violations of patient care and safety standards last year.
But in announcing the fresh inquiry, Marion County District Attorney Paige Clarkson said the grand jury would examine “current operations, capacity challenges and public safety implications associated with the Oregon State Hospital.”
As the district attorney in the county that houses state government agencies, Clarkson’s office is in a unique position to insert itself into matters that would normally fall under the governor’s jurisdiction. Her office conducted a grand jury inquiry into conditions at an Oregon Youth Authority correction facility last year, culminating in a public report that detailed concerns about living conditions, medical care and sexual abuse.
Clarkson, who is retiring at the end of the year, expects to release a public report about the grand jury’s findings in its Oregon State Hospital inquiry before she leaves. That document should be the floor for public disclosure, not the ceiling. Put more simply, her office should make all the grand jury proceedings public once its inquiry is complete, not just a summary report.
Let everyone with a stake in the inquiry — the families of patients who received substandard treatment at the hospital, state lawmakers tasked with oversight, the public whose tax dollars fund it — see everything that’s presented and discussed.
There will naturally be exceptions for issues like patient privacy. But while we appreciate the Oregon Health Authority’s acknowledgement of culture problems at the hospital during November’s legislative hearing, that acknowledgement was months overdue. And we don’t have a lot of trust in officials to be more candid this time around without the pressure of public scrutiny.
That’s why transparency is so important to restore public confidence in the Oregon State Hospital. And it won’t happen without a full airing of the facts.